杭州交通信息网一汽大众4s店几点上班:关于英文案件的翻译！！
来源：百度文库 编辑：杭州交通信息网 时间：2024/04/27 07:49:07
Davis Tune, Inc. v. Precision Franchising LLC, Circuit Court for Escambia County, Florida
Precision Franchising LLC v. Davis Tune, Inc. et al., Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
On February 15, 2005, PFL was served with a complaint in which franchisee Davis Tune, Inc. sought damages in excess of $30,000. Davis Tune, Inc. and its two shareholders, Mr. Donald Roe and Ms. Shirley F. Roe, were also defendants in a related action filed by PFL on November 1, 2004.
On June 10, 2005, the parties entered into a settlement agreement resolving both matters. Under the terms of the settlement Davis Tune, Inc. agreed to: (1) renew one of its Franchise Agreements that had expired and to re-brand the associated location as a Precision Tune Auto Care center; (2) pay approximately $11,000 in delinquent fees, and (3) pay PFL $75,000 in the event it fails to comply with all agreements between the parties.
The Company does not believe that any of the above claims or proceedings will result in a material judgment against the Company or any of it’s subsidiaries. There can be no assurance, however, that these suits will ultimately be decided in its favor. Any one of these claims or proceedings may result in a material judgment against the Company, which could cause material adverse consequences to its operations.
Precision Franchising LLC v. Davis Tune, Inc. et al., Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
On February 15, 2005, PFL was served with a complaint in which franchisee Davis Tune, Inc. sought damages in excess of $30,000. Davis Tune, Inc. and its two shareholders, Mr. Donald Roe and Ms. Shirley F. Roe, were also defendants in a related action filed by PFL on November 1, 2004.
On June 10, 2005, the parties entered into a settlement agreement resolving both matters. Under the terms of the settlement Davis Tune, Inc. agreed to: (1) renew one of its Franchise Agreements that had expired and to re-brand the associated location as a Precision Tune Auto Care center; (2) pay approximately $11,000 in delinquent fees, and (3) pay PFL $75,000 in the event it fails to comply with all agreements between the parties.
The Company does not believe that any of the above claims or proceedings will result in a material judgment against the Company or any of it’s subsidiaries. There can be no assurance, however, that these suits will ultimately be decided in its favor. Any one of these claims or proceedings may result in a material judgment against the Company, which could cause material adverse consequences to its operations.
戴维斯歌曲,公司 v。 精密特权 LLC, 巡回法庭为 Escambia 县, 佛罗里达
精密特权 LLC v。 戴维斯歌曲,公司 et al., 联邦的区域法院为维吉尼亚的东方区域
2005 年二月 15 日， PFL 被服务於 诉苦哪一总经销商戴维斯调节,公司寻找了损害超过 $30,000. 戴维斯歌曲，公司和它的二个股东 , 唐纳德先生獐和 Shirley 女士 F. 獐, 一个 2004 年十一月 1 日被 PFL 申请的相关行动的被告也是.
2005 年六月 10 日，宴会体会 殖民协议解决两件物质。 在殖民戴维斯歌曲的术语之下，公司同意:(1)更新它的其中之一已经 期满的特权协议并且到关于- 商标联合的位置如精密调节 Auto 照料中心;(2)薪资大约 $11,000 在怠忽的费用中，而且 (3) 薪资 PFL$75,000 在它无法的事件中遵从在宴会之间的所有协议。
公司不 相信任何一个上述的要求或进行将会造成对抗公司的一个物质的裁判，否则它之中的任何一个是子公司。 不 能有保证,然而，这些诉讼将会最后地在它的好意中被决定。 任何的这些宣称，否则进行可能造成对抗公司的一个物质的裁判, 可以引起对它的操作物质的不利结果。