hd sdi编码器:请英文高手帮我翻译,急用,谢谢

来源:百度文库 编辑:杭州交通信息网 时间:2024/04/28 21:52:41
When an organization develops its leaders, it increases their ability to contribute more to the organization (i.e., an improvement in human capital). Essentially, leaders who perform better after a development activity are more valuable for the organization, although their salary levels remain about the same.
Normally, the amount of leaders considered above average (i.e., above the 50 percent mark in leader performance) is 50 percent.Organizations using DDI’s development systems,however, find that 75 percent of their leaders are above average. Thus, the DDI client organizations are realizing improvements in leader performance of 25 percentage points.Leaders participating in development programs are 25 percent more capable than they were before the development activity.
To be conservative, we can say that there is a ceiling on leader performance and that a leader cannot possibly improve performance by 100 percent. Past studies have shown that there is
about a 40 percent deviation in performance for a given role. The best performers in a group are 40 percent more valuable than the average;the worst performers, 40 percent less valuable.
If a leader is 25 percent more valuable than he or she was before development, the total return can be calculated as follows. The newly developed leader achieves 25 percent of the
possible $24,000 improvement in performance.Therefore, the average improvement in value for a leader developed through DDI systems is $6,000 (.25 x $24,000). If we consider that the standard deviation in performance improvements from DDI programs is about 14 percent(11 percent to 39 percent), we can express
possible improvements as a range of $2,640 to $9,360. To calculate a true ROI, however,organizations must also consider the costs for developing leaders. Nevertheless, the benefits of improved leader skills are readily apparent.
Documented Results
Over its many years of designing and delivering leadership development solutions, DDI has repeatedly documented its ability to produce behavior change in leaders. This summary presents a cross section of studies and results from a broad range of clients. In addition to this summary, DDI has many other examples
of behavior change. Studies conducted by non-DDI researchers also have clearly established the effectiveness of behavioral modeling for producing change.

一个组织的领导人在发展,更增加了他们的组织能力. 从本质上来说,领导者有更好的表现后,更重要的是发展活动的组织,虽然他们的薪酬水平基本保持不变. 正常情况下,多少领导认为高于平均(即50%以上是在表现领袖)50使用DDI的系统开发,发现75%以上的领导人都是平均数. 因此,客户DDI组织实现绩效改进领导参加25points.leaders比例是25%建设比以前更有能力发展活动. 要保守,可以说是最高领导人的表现,一个领导不能百分之百的提高绩效. 以往的研究表明,有 约40%表现为某一角色偏差. 一组是表现最好的40%的平均比; 最坏的演员,40%较小. 如果有25%的领导人比他或她是在发展,总收益计算如下可以. 新开发完成的25%的领导人 $24,000Performance.therefore可能提高,平均提高了领导发展的价值体系,通过DDI$6000(X$24,0000.25). 如果我们认为标准差业绩改善计划约为14%来自DDI(11%至39%),可以表达 可能是一系列的改善$2640$9360. 计算真正适用,但也必须考虑成本组织发展领导人. 尽管如此,改进领导技能的好处是显而易见的. 结果记录 在多年的开发设计和提供解决方案的领导、DDI一再证明它有能力改变领导人产生行为. 本节简要介绍了各自的研究成果和广泛的客户. 除了这个总结,有很多例子DDI 行为改变. 研究非DDI研究者也明确规定行为的效果模型制作

当组织开发它的领导, 它增加他们的能力对组织(即, 在人力资本的改善) 贡献更多。根本上, 执行得更好的领导在发展活动是可贵的为组织之后, 虽然他们的工资水平依然是大致同样。通常, 相当数量领导被考虑在平均之上(即, 在百分之50 标记之上在领导表现) 是50 percent.Organizations 使用DDI..s 开放系统, 然而, 发现他们的领导的百分之75 是在平均之上。因而, DDI 客户组织体会在领导表现的改善25 百分比points.Leaders 参加发展方案比他们在发展活动之前百分之25 可胜任。是保守的, 我们能说, 有一块天花板在领导表现并且领导无法可能改进表现由百分之100 。通过研究表示, 有百分之40 偏差在表现为一个指定的角色。最佳的执行者在小组比average;the 最坏的执行者, 百分之40 百分之40 可贵的较不可贵。如果领导比他或她在发展之前百分之25 可贵的, 总回归可能被计算如下。最近被开发的领导达到可能的$24,000 的百分之25 在performance.Therefore 的改善, 平均改善按价值为领导被开发通过DDI 系统是$6,000 (25 x $24,000) 。如果我们考虑标准偏差在表现改善从DDI 节目是大约14 percent(11 百分之对百分之39), 我们能表达可能的改善作为范围的$2,640 到$9,360 。计算真实的ROI, 然而, 组织必须并且考虑费用为开发领导。然而, 改善的领导技能的好处是欣然明显的。被提供的结果经过岁月设计和提供领导发展解答, DDI 一再提供了它的能力导致行为变化在领导上。这个总结提出研究和结果的一个横剖面从客户的一个宽广的范围。除这个总结之外, DDI 有行为变动许多其它例子。研究由non-DDI 研究员进行清楚地并且建立了关于行为塑造的有效率为导致变动。