塞伯坦陨落 威震天:接咪咪子我要论文翻译~~~~哥哥姐姐救命呀~~~~~~

来源:百度文库 编辑:杭州交通信息网 时间:2024/04/28 17:00:17
Is Business Bluffing Ethical?
A respected businessman with whom I discussed the theme of this article remarked with some heat, “You mean to say you’re going to encourage men to bluff? Why, bluffing if nothing ore than a form of lying! You’re advising them to lie! ”
I agreed that the basis of private morality is respect for truth and that the closer a businessman comes to the truth, the more be deserves respect. At the same time , I suggested that most bluffing in business might be regarded simply as game strategy much like bluffing in poker, which does not reflect on the morality of the bluffer.
I quoted Herry Taylor, the British statesman who pointed out that “falsehood cease to be falsehood when it is understood on all sides that the truth is not expected to be spoken” —an exact description of bluffing in poker, diplomacy, and business. I cited the analogy of the criminal court, where the criminal is not expected to tell the truth when he pleads “not guilty.” Everyone from the judge down takes it for granted that the job of the defendant’s attorney is to get his client off not to reveal the truth; and this is considered ethical practice. I mentioned Representative Omar Burleson. The Democrat form Texas, who was quoted as saying, in regard to the ethics of Congress, “Ethics is barrel of worms”—a pungent summing up of the problem of deciding who is ethical in politics.
I reminded my friend that millions of businessmen feel constrained every day to say yes to their bosses when they secretly believe no and that this is generally accepted as permissible strategy when the alternative might be the loss of a job. The essential point, I said, is that the ethics of business are game ethics, different from the ethics of religion.
We can learn a good deal about the nature of business by comparing it with poker. While both have a large element of chance, in the long run the winner is the man who plays with steady skill. In both games ultimate victory requires intimate knowledge of the rules, insight into the psychology of the other players, a bold front, a considerable amount of self-discipline, and the ability to respond swiftly and effectively to opportunities provided by chance.
Not one expects poker to be played on the ethical principles preached in churches. In poker it is right and proper to bluff a friend out of the rewards of being dealt a good hand. A player feels no more than a slight twinge of sympathy, if that, when-with nothing better than single ace in his hand –he strips a heavy loser, who holds a pair, of the rest of the chips, It was up to the other fellow to protect himself. In the words of an excellent poker player, former President Harry Truman, “If you can’t stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.” If one shows mercy to a loser in poker, it is a personal gesture, divorced from the rules of the game.
我不要软件翻译~

生意吓唬是伦理的吗吗?
一个我讨论这一个文章的主题被尊敬的商人由于一些热,"你意谓你将要鼓励男人吓唬? 为什么, 吓唬如果无矿石比较说谎的一种形式! 你正在劝告他们躺着! ”
我同意私人的道德基础是事实的尊敬,而且哪一比较靠近的一个商人得到事实, 更多是该得到尊敬。 同时,当游戏策略多喜欢在扑克牌中吓唬的时候 , 我在生意方面吓唬的大部分只是可能被视为,不思索比较直率的道德。
我 Herry 泰勒, 指出的英国政治家 "当它在所有的边上被了解的时候 , 谎言停止是谎言事实没被期望被讲" —精确的在扑克牌,交际手腕和生意方面吓唬的描述。我引证了犯罪的法院相似, 当他从法官辩护 "不有罪的 ." 每个人下的时候 , 罪犯不被说实话期望视为理所当然被告的代理人的工作要争取他的客户远的不要揭露事实;和这被考虑伦理的练习。 我提到了代表性的 Omar Burleson 。 Democrat 形式德克萨斯 , 被引述如叙述,关于国会的道德规范, "道德规范是桶的虫" —苦痛的是伦理的在政治中的决定问题的总结。
当他们秘密地相信的时候我提醒我的数以百万计商人的朋友每天强迫对他们的老板是的没有而且这被通常接受当可允许的策略当替代选择可能是工作的损失时候。 必要的点,我说, 是生意的道德规范是游戏道德规范, 不同的宗教道德规范。
我们能藉由把它与扑克牌作比较相当学习关于生意的性质事。当两者有机会的一种大的元素时候,最后胜利者是和稳定的技术玩的男人。在游戏终极胜利需要规则的亲密知识 , 对其他运动员的心理学的洞察 , 大胆的前面 , 相当量的自我训练 , 和能力都中偶然很快地而且有效地回应机会提供。
不是一期待要被利用伦理的原则扑克牌在教堂中传道。 在扑克牌中它是正确的和对被处理一只好手从酬谢吓唬一位朋友是适当的。一个运动员觉得只达一个微小的同情一阵一阵痛, 如果那,何时-由于比单一么点好的什么也没有在他的他脱衣重的薯条其余者的失败者的手–中,它对其他的人是向上保护他自己,支撑双。 在优良的扑克牌运动员的字中,前总统掠夺杜鲁门,"如果你不能站着热,厨房外出" 如果一在扑克牌中将仁慈展示给一个失败者看,它是一个个人的手势,从游戏的规则办离婚。