中国个人征信网上查询:2008年北京奥运会英语作文

The lucky baby first time declares a position MV
Austria transported the subject music " 2008 " the MV real-life scenery photography to the day before yesterday evening officially in 81 factories open machine, this section of MV first time used the lucky baby image in the image photography. " 2008 " composes music, the great light by the famous composer Artemisia stelleriana auspicious light arranges the tune, combines " the classical fashion " by the Western happy 7 people the performance, MV New Year's Day the bilingual party always directs Luo by 2006 great directs and first time uses in this party, on December 31st the evening in central 3 set, central 9 set, Yang regards the Spanish French frequency channel first time meets with everywhere audiences.

According to directs Luo Wei introduces, entire MV except that " the classical fashion " in the combination 7 individual performances images, other parts all will use the three dimensional animation manufacture, the lucky baby defer to Austria transport conduct the city the order, will fly in turn Athens Wei Cheng, the ancient Egyptian pyramid, the French 埃菲尔 iron tower, Australia's Sydney opera house, the Japanese Mount Fuji, the American free goddess picture, Russia's Kremlin, finally will come to the Beijing Temple of Heaven. " Classical fashion " when combination performance uses the cello, the violin, the flute and so on 3 kind of musical instruments also all can " use " by the lucky baby.
福娃首次亮相MV

奥运主题音乐《2008》MV的实景拍摄于前天晚上正式在八一厂开机，这段MV首次在影像拍摄中采用福娃形象。《2008》由著名作曲家薛瑞光作曲、张宏光编曲，由西洋乐7人组合“古典时尚”演奏，MV由2006年元旦双语晚会总导演罗伟执导并首次在该晚会中使用，于12月31日晚在中央3套、中央9套、央视西班牙语法语频道首次与海内外观众见面。

据导演罗伟介绍，整个MV除了“古典时尚”组合中7个人的演奏形象，其他部分均采用三维动画制作，福娃将按照奥运举办城市的顺序，依次飞过雅典卫城、古埃及金字塔、法国埃菲尔铁塔、澳大利亚的悉尼歌剧院、日本富士山、美国自由女神像、俄国的克里姆林宫，最后来到北京天坛。“古典时尚”组合演奏时使用的大提琴、小提琴、长笛等3种乐器也均会被福娃“使用”。

Bidding for and hosting the Olympics successfully is, perhaps, the ultimate glory for a city. However, before transforming the dream into reality, the benefits and drawbacks of bidding for the Olympics should be weighed carefully.
Hosting the Olympics surely would bring about much gain to a city. Boom of the local economy, more jobs, and the possibility of generating income all sound extremely attractive to the municipal government. At the same time, better infrastructure, cleaner environment, enjoying the spectacular game with hundreds of sports elites and entertainment stars, and the opportunity of contacting people from all over the world also seem exciting to the citizens. Besides, the bidding will definitely promote the patriotic emotion and pride, as well as the moral behavior in local people. In most cases, bidding for the Olympics is well supported by both the public and the central government.
Unfortunately, this is not the entire view of the pretty picture. If looking from another angle, the Olympic bid might bring about some side-effects to a city.
First of all, the environmental impacts, including the increasing exhaust fumes of cars, more pressure on water resources, huge amount of wasted leaflets and other materials used for public activities, are most probably neglected. In order to broaden the streets, some trees may have to be cut. Near the construction site, the tiny dust may linger in the air for a long time. Reduction of farmland may be caused by the need of setting up new sports centre or accommodation facilities. These environmental consequences can be especially serious in a resource-limited and densely-populated city in a third-world country.
Besides, if talking about the economic benefit, it should not be forgotten that a quick boosting may lead to bubble growth, which may easily crash. If not well managed and organized, the big event may not be so profitable, and the new facilities may be forever empty after the games. Yes, there have been cases that host cities ended up with enormous debts.
Finally, let’s think about the low-income groups in the city. What will they get from the Olympics bidding? More tax, more fees, more expensive property prices, and higher cost of living. These definitely are not good news for them.
To bid or not to, this is a question. It is up to the choice of the municipal government, and the local public. After the decision, what they can do is to make the most of the benefit, and reduce the drawbacks to the least.