重楼种子怎样育苗视频:英文翻译!

Why is it done? Because it's easier on the manager -- do I want to hold onto this guy or go through the hassle of trying to hire and train someone new? And it's easier on the employee -- there's equal hassle in looking for and starting a new job. Both parties are inherently oriented toward choosing the "easy" way -- to the very real detriment of both.

Your star employee, once a dynamo, once willing, able and eager to tackle any task, no longer shows that drive. The problem may be outside personal problems -- whereupon you have the obligation to help him through that period. However, it's more likely that he's simply no longer learning at the rate he was. He's no longer stimulated and challenged -- he's bored.

It's time for him to move on -- and instead of trying to hold him with pay and benefits -- you should try to help him find a new job where he can continue to grow.

Cross-train.
People enjoy best doing what they do best. A born salesman will not be happy doing account audits -- despite the fact he may have spent many years getting an accounting education. Everyone is good at some things -- and lousy at others. But most people don't get the chance to find out what it is they're good at. Give them that chance!
Say you hire someone in to do assembly. In time, they're doing that job competently -- maybe very well -- but they've stopped learning. They may or may not become a problem -- but they're certainly not stimulated, motivated. You can raise their pay and benefits, but as we've said before, that's a short-term fix -- with long-term consequences.